A proposed vegetation classification for the oceanic wet grasslands of Scotland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33928/1bib.2026.08.049Keywords:
Calthion;, mesotrophic grassland, species-rich meadow, biodiversity, National Vegetation Classification , machairAbstract
The lack of clear community definitions for the oceanic wet grasslands of Scotland has resulted in them being overlooked in some conservation schemes, which have tended to focus primarily on the vegetation of the cultivated machair and associated sand dunes. This study recognises five distinct vegetation communities that could be further segregated into ten units equivalent to subcommunities of the British National Vegetation Classification (NVC). These communities show differing ranges in respect of three soil parameters: available phosphorus, pH and organic content. The subcommunities themselves differ in their tolerances to soil moisture, soil fertility and soil reaction, as assessed by their Ellenberg indicator values. The Scottish communities were distinct when compared to communities of the Calthion alliance found in England and Wales with limited overlap. When compared to the Irish Community Classification (IVS) there was more overlap of the data, but alignment to recognised communities was poor. In a broader European context, when compared with data drawn from across twelve alliances, the Scottish communities are mainly associated with the Calthion, yet are discrete from the English and Irish communities of that alliance. They occupy a narrow, central position on the fertility gradient with a broader spread along the hydrological gradient. They are generally less fertile than their English counterparts, which are in turn more fertile than many of the continental communities in the Calthion. The greatest threat to the biodiversity of these grasslands is changing management through both abandonment and intensification, and climate change through increasing rainfall and rising sea levels.
References
Acton, A. 2004. NVC Survey of the fen, marsh and swamp vegetation communities of the Lochs of Spiggie and Brow SSSI, Shetland. A report for Scottish Natural Heritage.
Angus, S. 2018. Beyond the meta-ecosystem? The need for a multi-faceted approach to climate change in low-lying coastal wetlands: the case of South Uist, Scotland. Ocean and Coastal Management 165:334–345.
Angus, S. 2020. Clanranald’s inland Uist waterway. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 149:7–24.
Angus, S. & Hansom, J.D. 2021. Enhancing the resilience of high-vulnerability, low-elevation coastal zones. Ocean & Coastal Management 200:105414.
Cooper, E. & MacKintosh, J. 1996. NVC Review of Scottish grassland surveys. Perth: SNH Review No 65.
Crossley, J.E. 2016. Aith meadows NVC survey 2016. Report to Scottish Natural Heritage.
Currall, J.F.P. 1987 A transformation of the DOMIN scale. Vegetatio 72:81-87.
Dargie, T. 1998. Sand dune vegetation survey of Scotland: Western Isles. 3 Vols. SNH Research, Survey and Monitoring Report No. 96.
Dargie, T. & Dargie, M. 1993. RSPB Coll Reserve. 1993 NVC vegetation survey.
Dargie, T. 1994. Botanical survey of Tiree 1993 – Survey method and results. Unpublished report to Scottish Natural Heritage. Clydebank: Scottish Natural Heritage.
Dunn, A.J. 1964. Multiple contrasts using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241-252.
Ellenberg, H. 1988. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, J., Gowing, D. & Wallace, H. 2009. Available soil phosphorus in semi-natural grasslands: Assessment methods and community tolerances. Biological Conservation 142:1074-1083.
Hutcheon, K.E. & Hutcheon, B.W. 2003. NVC Survey of the Isle of Coll. Report to SNH.
Malloch, A.J.C. 1998. MATCH: a computer program to aid the assignment of vegetation data to the communities and subcommunities of the National Vegetation Classification. University of Lancaster, Unit of Vegetation Science.
Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. New York: Wiley.
Pakeman, R.J., Huband, S., Kriel, A. & Lewis, R. 2011. Changes in the management of Scottish machair communities and associated habitats from the 1970s to the present. Scottish Geographical Journal 127(4):267–287.
Pakeman, R.J., Hewison, R.L. & Lewis, R.J. 2016. Drivers of species richness and compositional change in Scottish coastal vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science 20(2):183-193.
Pakeman, R. 2017. The changing plant communities of Scotland’s sand dunes and machair. British Wildlife 28(6):415–420.
Perrin, P.M. 2019. Irish Vegetation Classification - ERICA - Engine for Releves to Irish communities. Assignment V5.0.
Perrin, P.M. 2021. The Irish Classification. Community synopsis. National Biodiversity Centre, Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht.
Pitkin, P., Barter, G., Curry, P., MacKintosh, J., Orange, O. & Urquhart, U. 1983. Reviews of the SSSI of N and W coasts of Uists and nearby beaches. Scottish Field Unit.
Rodwell, J.S., ed. 1991. et seq. British Plant Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rodwell, J.S., Dring, J.C., Averis, A.B.G., Proctor, M.C.F., Malloch, A.J.C., Schaminée, J.H.J. & Dargie, T.C.D. 2000. Review of coverage of the National Vegetation Classification. JNCC Report 302. Peterborough: JNCC.
Tichý, L. & Holt, J. 2006. Juice program for management, analysis and classification of ecological data. Vegetation Science Group, Masaryk University, Brno.
Tichý, L., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Talbot, S.S. & Botta-Dukát, Z. 2010. OptimClass: using species-to-cluster fidelity to determine the optimal partition in classification of ecological communities. Journal of Vegetation Science 21:287-299.
Wallace, H.L., Rothero, E. & Gowing, D.G. 2020. Review of Oceanic wet grassland vegetation in Scotland. Report to the Halpin Trust. FMP, Open University.
Wallace, H.L. & Prosser, M.V. 2017. A review of the National Vegetation Classification for the Calthion group of plant communities in England and Wales. English Nature Joint Publication JP021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 H.L. Wallace, C.S. Lawson, D.J.G. Gowing

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and licence: Authors (or their employers) retain their copyright in articles and images published in British & Irish Botany and are not required to assign this to the Botanical Society of Britain & Ireland (BSBI). All that BSBI requires from authors is a license to publish the article in British & Irish Botany and make it freely available to all in pdf format under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License, which also enables BSBI to reproduce components of the article in other BSBI outputs (eg. BSBI News, the BSBI website and/or the BSBI News & Views blog) for publicity purposes. The licence code can be accessed here:
